Tell us if you like or dislike Jurisprudence to display persons you share this with. This way you can discover people just like you!
Wonderful, the power of words...
terrifying, the power of those who can alter words’ meanings!
Philosophy of Complexity is a MUST for understanding legal theory now. #legatech #jurisprudence #informationtechnology
Folks say donald trump will be proven innocent after he fires all the honest folks at the department of justice! #legal #law #jurisprudence
#jurisprudence means (n.) The philosophy, science, and study of law and decisions based on the interpretation thereof
A first year law student would excoriate any prosecutor submitting this “evidence” to a trial judge! #jurisprudence
Aim above Morality, Be not simply Good, Be good for something ...
A reminder that the two main characters in Miss Congeniality 2 are called Hart and Fuller. #jurisprudence
Bofors case: #SupremeCourt said that it would be against criminal #jurisprudence to permit a third party who is not connected to the case.
magic8ball bbcbreaking quote what are the WhiteHouse minimum standards . HHSgov foreignpolicy #english #1601 #jurisprudence who
Jurisprudence or legal theory is the theoretical study of law, principally by philosophers but, from the twentieth century, also by social scientists. Scholars of jurisprudence, also known as jurists or legal theorists, hope to obtain a deeper understanding of legal reasoning, legal systems, legal institutions, and the role of law in society.Modern jurisprudence began in the 18th century and was focused on the first principles of the natural law, civil law, and the law of nations. General jurisprudence can be divided into categories both by the type of question scholars seek to answer and by the theories of jurisprudence, or schools of thought, regarding how those questions are best answered. Contemporary philosophy of law, which deals with general jurisprudence, addresses problems internal to law and legal systems, and problems of law as a particular social institution as law relates to the larger political and social situation in which it exists.This article distinguishes three distinct branches of thought in general jurisprudence. To begin with, ancient natural law, as a major branch and theory of jurisprudence, is the idea that there are rational objective limits to the power of legislative rulers. The foundations of law are accessible through reason and it is from these laws of nature that human-created laws gain whatever force they have. Secondly, 'clarificatory' or analytic jurisprudence rejects natural law's fusing of what law is and what it ought to be. It espouses the use of a neutral point of view and descriptive language when referring to aspects of legal systems. It comprises different theories of jurisprudence. For example, legal positivism, holds that there is no necessary connection between law and morality and that the force of law comes from some basic social facts. And legal realism argues that the real world practice of law is what determines what law is; the law has the force that it does because of what legislators, lawyers and judges do with it. Thirdly, normative jurisprudence is concerned with "evaluative" theories of law. It deals with what the goal or purpose of law is, or what moral or political theories provide a foundation for the law. Besides the question "What is law?", it tries to answer what the proper function of law was, or what sorts of acts should be subject to legal sanctions, and what sorts of punishment should be permitted.